 |
| Value
of Trust |
|
Page Contents:

"trust
is the big issue of the 21st century"
According to Kieron
O'Hara, Trust From Socrates to Spin
"every business
type and category has trust issues.
According to Rich
Jernstedt, CEO, Golin/Harris International.
|
AMERICAN BUSINESS FACES A CRISIS
OF TRUST

"The erosion
of trust indicated in the research is a call to action.
And it must be heard loud and clear.
Nearly 70 percent of survey respondents
said, I dont know whom to trust anymore,
and said they will hold businesses to a higher
standard in their behavior and communications.

|
Crisis
of Trust
(Top)
With the
current crisis of trust organizations need to rethink
their confidence-building strategy. The current
piecemeal approach to trust places organizations
in real danger of financial and other losses. What
is required is a holistic mindset and continuous
assessment of stakeholder uncertainties. However,
a comprehensive and unified approach continues to
be elusive. Hence initiatives to address trust issues
continue to be reactive, tactical responses aimed
at suppressing highly visible incidents.
Trust
Enablement is our approach to explicitly and
strategically addressing stakeholders' trust requirements.
It has the potential to alter an industry's competitive
landscape and put Trust Enabled organizations
at the forefront of management innovation.
Trust
Enablement is an exercise in managing uncertainty.
Organizations must match their stakeholders' acceptance
of uncertainty with the right balance of processes
that establish required levels of trust and protect
from any deficiency or loss of trust.
The
challenge is to find the optimal middle ground between
the costs of increased trust versus control. On
the one hand organizations can spend too much time
and resources and bump up against diminishing returns
- since achieving 100-per-cent trust is not possible.
Yet on the other hand, lax policies and processes
and too little investment in trust and confidence
augmentation initiatives lead to losses, both realized
and in foregone opportunities.
Trust
Enablement, our code of practice, defines
a systematized approach to bridging confidence gaps
between organizations and their stakeholders by
easing reliance on the information needed to engage
in business activities. Trust Enabled processes
help to accelerate and intensify stakeholder engagement.
(Top)
Studies
State of Trust in Leaders
O'Hara,
K., (2004) "Trust
From Socrates to Spin", Icon Books.
("Polls record levels
of trust in politicians, businessmen, scientists
and others that are at all time lows: a crisis in
trust is currently gripping Western culture... trust
is the big issue of the 21st century")
(“Our trust in our leaders
is low and declining. Only leaders of NGOs were trusted by more than
50 per cent of the respondents (and even then not
with a massive vote of confidence”, quoting results
of the Davos World Economic Forum survey.)
Accenture (2004) “The business of trust”,
white paper referencing the World Economic Forum.
(“This is a truly global phenomenon.
Just 17 per cent of Americans now rate the honesty
and ethics of business executives highly, for example,
while nearly three quarters of people in Tokyo,
Hong Kong, Taipei and Singapore think ‘recent events
have caused a crisis of confidence and trust in
the way we do business.”)
World
Economic Forum, “Survey on Trust”, November
2002, for the TRUST theme of the 2003 Annual Meeting
in the Davos, World Economic Forum.
Research was conducted by Gallup International’s
Voice of the People survey, designed in collaboration
with Environics International.
(“With few exceptions leaders
across the spheres of endeavour and countries …
are given lower trust ratings than the institutions
they lead.”)
(“Significant minorities [about
40%] of citizens self-report that their trust in
all three categories of leaders has fallen over
the past year”, with similar numbers reporting their
trust has stayed the same. Only about 10% reported their trust has increased.”)
Hacker, S. K., Willard, M. A., and Couturier,
L. (2002) “The Trust Imperative”, American
Society of Quality, pp. 7.
(According to a The Atlanta
Consulting Group study, “48% of the people surveyed
trusted their bosses and just over half (52%) trusted
upper management.
While 66% of the respondents admitted that
their companies had clearly stated values, only
33% believed they were evident in the actions of
the organization.”)
Ezekiel,
Z. (2005) “Rebuilding Trust in Canadian
Institutions”, The Conference Board of Canada.
(“Canadians rank Chief Executive
Officers (traditionally, highly respected in western
societies) and politicians among the least trusted
profession.” Politicians are believed likely to
lie by 91% of Canadians, and corporate executives
83%.”)
(“For example, in a 2002 Ipsos-Reid
survey, 83 per cent of Canadians thought corporate
executives were somewhat or very likely to lie when
making statements to the news media. A still higher
proportion, 91 per cent, believed the same of politicians.
In early 2003, only 21 per cent of Canadians thought
chief executive officers (CEOs) were trustworthy
or extremely trustworthy.”)
(“In a 2005 survey of Canadians,
only 16 per cent of respondents thought CEOs and
chief financial officers (CFOs) were credible sources
of information about their companies.”)
Edelman
(2005) “Sixth Annual Edelman Trust Barometer:
A Global Study of Opinion Leaders”, Edelman.
(“Academics and doctors are
the most credible spokespeople when forming an opinion
of a company in Canada and the U.S., whereas the
CEO of a company is least trusted.”)
Armour,
S. (February 5, 2002) "Employees' new motto:
Trust no one", USA Today, published by
Council of Public Relations Firms.
(“Nearly 50% say corporations
can be trusted only a little or not at all to look
out for the interests of their employees, according
to the USA TODAY/ CNN/Gallup survey….
more than 40% say executives are only interested
in looking out for themselves -- even if it harms
the corporation they work for.”)
Accenture (2004) “The business
of trust”, white paper referencing the World
Economic Forum.
(“There are also declining
levels of trust within organizations, with employees
questioning whether their employers are being honest
with them. The vast majority (84 per cent) of Americans
think that the people who run their companies are
trying to do what is best for themselves rather
than the company. Worryingly, attitudes tend to
be worse amongst longer-serving employees. The 2002
‘Britain at Work’ survey found that management communication
is trusted by about half (52 per cent) of employees
with less than two years’ service, but only 32 per
cent of employees with 15 years’ or more service.”)
(“Survey of senior executives
around the world found that only 69 per cent were
confident that their CEO has strong moral values.
In Europe, just 56 per cent shared such confidence,
compared with 72 per cent in north America and 73
per cent in Asia Pacific.”)
State of Trust
in Business
Jernstedt,
R. (2002) "Golin/Harris Trust Survey, 2002",
Golin/Harris International.
("Every business type
and category has trust issues.")
("Nearly 70 percent of
survey respondents said, ‘I don't know whom to trust
anymore.’”)
Accenture (2004) “The business
of trust”, white paper referencing the World
Economic Forum.
(“Large companies in particular
are now viewed by many people as interested only
in their own self-serving objectives. Recent corporate scandals have led people to
apply the same analysis to individual business leaders.”)
World Economic Forum (update 2004) “Survey
on Trust”, following up on the TRUST theme of
the 2003 Annual Meeting in the Davos, World Economic
Forum. Research
was conducted by GlobeScan Incorporated (formerly
Environics International).
(“Trust levels for global companies,
while still very low, are now at or above where
they were in December 2000 (prior to the Enron scandal),
in 13 of the 18 countries for which comparable data
is available. Significant
improvements in corporate trust have occurred since
August 2002 in ten of the 18 tracking countries.”)
World
Economic Forum, “Survey on Trust”, November
2002, for the TRUST theme of the 2003 Annual Meeting
in the Davos, World Economic Forum.
Research was conducted by Gallup International’s
Voice of the People survey, designed in collaboration
with Environics International.
(“Global companies and large
domestic companies are equally distrusted to operate
in the best interests of society, ranking next to
national legislative bodies at the bottom of the
trust ratings.”)
PollingReport.com; The Gallup Poll May 21-23, 2004 and June 9-10,
2003, and 1973 - 2002; The Harris Poll, February
9-16, 2004; FOX News/Opinion Dynamic Poll, May 20-21,
2003; and Bloomberg News Poll, June 11-16, 2002,
PollingReport.com.
(“Confidence in big business
is consistently among the lowest (lowest or second
lowest) of all institutions in the U.S. consistently
across studies and over time.” See [Figure 1])
Luaszewski,
J. E. (2002) “American Business Faces a Crisis
of Trust”, Golin/Harris International.
(“The survey found that every
business type and category have trust issues.”)
(“Nearly 70 percent of survey
respondents said, ‘I don’t know whom to trust anymore,’
and said they will “hold businesses to a higher
standard in their behavior and communications”)
Wall
Street Journal (September 16, 2002) “Taking It
on Faith”, Wall Street
Journal
(“Small
businesses are the most trusted by consumers, while
large corporations are least trusted, other than
e-tailers.”)
State of Trust in Institutions
Yankelovich (2004) “State of Consumer Trust:
Rebuilding the bonds of trust”, Yankelovich.
(“The data suggest that anywhere
from two-thirds to four-fifths of Americans display
a profound distrust of institutions.”)
World Economic Forum (update
2004) “Survey on Trust”, following up on the TRUST
theme of the 2003 Annual Meeting in the Davos, World
Economic Forum.
Research was conducted by GlobeScan Incorporated
(formerly Environics International).
(“Consistent with previous
research, the current poll shows that non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) are the most trusted and global
companies are least trusted of the seven institutions
tested. The United Nations comes second to NGOs
across the countries surveyed, followed by national
governments in the middle range of trust.”)
Cook,
T. E., and Gronke, P. (April 2001) “The dimensions
of Institutional Trust: How Distinct is Public Confidence in the Media?”,
paper prepared for delivery a the annual meeting
of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
(“A general decline in public
confidence in institutions is observed in the United
States, with the exception of the military, from
1973 to 1998. Major
companies experienced a relatively small decline
during the same period, with the second highest
volatility.”)
Edelman
(January 9, 2004), “Study of Opinion Leaders”,
2004 Edelman Fifth Annual Trust Barometer.
(“Trust in institutions is
stronger in the U.S., than Europe: government (U.S.
= 48% vs Europe = 31%), business (U.S. = 51% vs
Europe = 40%) and NGOs (U.S. = 47% vs Europe 41%)
… Trust in business is trending higher with the
U.S. at 51% (vs 48% in Jan. 03 and 41% in Jan. 02)
…Trust in NGOs, which had been growing steadily
in previous years, is down slightly (U.S. = 47%
vs 49% in Jan. 03, and Europe = 41% vs 45% in Jan
03)”.)
Edelman
(2005) “Sixth Annual Edelman Trust Barometer:
A Global Study of Opinion Leaders”, Edelman.
(“Trust
in nongovernmental organizations has steadily increased
in the US (’01 = 36% to ’05 = 55%), joining Europe
and Canada, where they are already regarded as the
most trusted institution.”)
Yankelovich (2004) “State
of Consumer Trust: Rebuilding the bonds of trust”,
Yankelovich..
(“It comes as no surprise that
consumers today report having very little trust
in institutions generally, and corporations in particular….
Anywhere from two-thirds to four-fifths of Americans
display a profound distrust of institutions…. 80%
are ‘sceptical about the accuracy of new stories
and information presented in the media’; 80% believe
American business is too concerned about its profit
and not concerned enough about its responsibilities
to workers, customers, and the environment’; 69%
believe that ‘if the opportunity arises, most businesses
will take advantage of the public if they feel they
are not likely to be found out.’”)
State of Trust in Intermediaries
Cook, T. E., and Gronke, P.
(April 2001) “The dimensions of Institutional
Trust: How
Distinct is Public Confidence in the Media?”,
paper prepared for delivery a the annual
meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association,
Chicago.
(Confidence in the media among
Americans has declined consistently and more rapidly
than any other institution from 1973 to 2000.}
The
Conference Board of Canada (August 19, 2005) “News
release 6-12”, The Conference Board of Canada.
(“One quarter of Canadians
don’t trust information from third parties [with
only about one in two trusting the information they
receive from journalists, financial analysts, or
auditors on corporations and government].”)
Stakeholder
Influence(Top)
There
is growing recognition by organizations that some
stakeholders possess significant influence over
them:
-
More
information is publicly available on the activity
of organizations and the impact of these activities
on employees, shareholders, society, the environment
and the economy;
-
Stakeholders
demand higher standards of behaviour from organizations;
-
The
legitimacy of these demands is more widely recognized
by government, regulators and civil society. At the
same time, organizations recognize the conflicts of
interest they have with stakeholders, and the lack
of consensus between and within stakeholder groups;
and
-
Stakeholders
exert their relative power advantages for self-interest.
This
is a dilemma that Trust Enablement seeks to
address. It does not provide a prescriptive framework
for the resolution of conflicts, but it does provide
a process for organizations to begin to address
them through engaging with stakeholders to find
common ground and build trust.
This process of engagement with stakeholders is
at the heart of Trust Enablement. Engagement
is not about organizations abdicating responsibilities
for their activities, but rather using leadership
to build relationships with stakeholders, and hence
improving their overall performance.
Stakeholder engagement can be at the heart of a
virtuous circle of performance improvement. Meaningful
engagement with stakeholders can:
-
Anticipate
and manage conflicts.
-
Improve
decision-making from management, employees, investors
and other external stakeholders.
-
Build
consensus amongst diverse views.
-
Create
stakeholder identification with the outcomes of the
organization's activities.
-
Build
trust in the organization.
These
five factors are key to improving financial performance,
for example, through the improved recruitment and
retention of employees, or the increased sophistication
of risk management systems. They are also key to
improving the organization's performance on other
measures in a manner that satisfies the aspirations
of the organization's stakeholders. If the engagement
improves stakeholder satisfaction, this will also
play a role in supporting the long-term financial
performance of the organization.
(Top)
Value
of Trust
Trust is the basis for all business engagement
and stakeholder collaboration. Since no organization is
an island and few organizations have absolute control over
their business environment, their prosperity and very existence
hinges on their ability to win the support of key stakeholders.
It is therefore critical for organizations to engender confidence
in the information they provide to stakeholders with explicitly
designed business processes and mechanisms that help to
reduce and mitigate uncertainties that inhibit stakeholder
engagement. Regardless of whether an organization suffers
from a crisis of trust or already enjoys high levels of
trust, in an increasingly commoditized world stakeholder
trust and confidence are defining the winners and losers.
Alan Greenspan
was quoted by the Wall Street Journal as saying that
breakdowns in corporate governance could undermine the trust
necessary for efficient markets, which threatens to "significantly
erode" the economy's impressive gains in productivity.
In a New
York Times article, R. L. Butler, a retired clergyman
in Denver was quoted as saying "The worst thing
now, is you can't even trust the earnings reports. When
you find the auditors in bed with the managers, there is
nobody to believe."
"Never
before in the history of our country has there been a lower
level of trust in public institutions and corporations,"
According to Howard Schultz, Starbucks' CEO and founder,
whose venture capital company, Maveron invested in eBay
(Nasdaq: EBAY) and Drugstore.com -- now two of the biggest
names in e-commerce. Given consumers' disenchantment, he
thinks that brands that inspire trust are more valuable
than ever.
Studies
General Business Benefits
of Trust
Todd A., http://trustenablement.com/.
(Trust is integral to every
transaction and the foundation for business success. It
drives the volume, velocity and value of every business
transaction.)
Todd A., http://trustenablement.com/value_of_trust.htm.
(Trust is the basis for all
business engagement and stakeholder collaboration. Since
no organization is an island and few organizations have
absolute control over their business environment, their
prosperity and very existence hinges on their ability to
win the support of key stakeholders. It is therefore critical
for organizations to engender confidence in the information
they provide to stakeholders with explicitly designed business
processes and mechanisms that help to reduce and mitigate
uncertainties that inhibit stakeholder engagement. Regardless
of whether an organization suffers from a crisis of trust
or already enjoys high levels of trust, in an increasingly
commoditized world stakeholder trust and confidence are
defining the winners and losers.)
(There
is a magic that certain companies have (eBay, Google, Harley
Davidson, HP, Coca Cola earlier and maybe also GE and Microsoft)
where companies transcend the normal bounds of management.
Investors consistently value their shares at epic price/earnings
ratios, employees evidence unusual loyalty and performance,
customers use their products and gush about them, and the
press finds ways to give them the benefit of the doubt (how
would the market have responded to any other bank in Canada
had it encountered the same IT failure that Royal Bank did
earlier last year). Perhaps, "trust" is one of
the underlying currencies that make this happen, where trust
isn't an accident or an afterthought, but the carefully
designed objective of a pattern of actions.)
Hacker,
S. K., Willard, M. A., and Couturier, L. (2002) “The
Trust Imperative”, American Society of Quality, pp.
1.
(“Trust is not an option in
the success formula; it is an imperative.”
Ward, A., and Smith,
J. (2003) “Trust and Mistrust”, John Wiley &
Sons Ltd., pp. 23-25.
(“Business is about money.
We make the case that it is also about trust – about
managing the risk of consciously behaving in ways that benefit
others…. We do not directly claim that more trust equals more money (although
that is clearly the case, as we will show later)… moneymaking opportunities are severely constrained
without trust… trust
ultimately underpins everything that business depends upon. The limiting factor in business development
is no longer the availability of resources but imagination
about way to collaborate.” )
Bader, G. E., and Liljenstrand, A.
(May 2003) “The Value of Building Trust in the
Workplace”, WorkIndex.com,.
(A “study of 4,000 employees in eight countries concludes
that building trust and emphasizing business ethics in the
workplace pays off in tangible and intangible ways, helping
the company's bottom line. Sponsored by United Technologies
and conducted by Pamela Shockley-Zalabak, Ph.D., Kathleen
Ellis, Ph.D., and Ruggero Cesaria, the study showed "trust
is more than a social virtue and it serves as an economic
imperative for business resilience in a global marketplace."
Its findings show that organizations with high levels of
trust continually benefit from:
*
Adaptive organizational structures
*
Strategic alliances
*
Responsive virtual teams
*
Effective crisis management
* Reduced transaction and litigation costs”)
Share Value
Ezekiel, Z. (2005) “Rebuilding
Trust in Canadian Institutions”, The Conference Board
of Canada.
(“Public distrust can have
an impact on share prices. In testimony before Congress,
U.S. Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan noted
that damaged investor confidence in audited financial statements
had led to lower valuations for equity securities.”)
Note:
eBay still traded at a 143 P/E, as of June 20, 2002, or 420% of
the industry average, this is after the dot com crash.
The McKinsey
Quarterly, “Article at a Glance:
Better boards in Thailand”, The
McKinsey Quarterly http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com.
(“Companies [listed on the
stock exchange in Thailand] with strong corporate governance
practices have higher market valuations.”)
Thompson,
M. (June 4, 2001) “Better Corporate Governance Pays Off
for Large Companies in Emerging Markets”, http://www.socialfunds.com.
(“In examining the 100 largest
companies in emerging markets, researchers found a strong
correlation between corporate governance and financial performance
ratios.”).
The Financial
Express (May 5, 2003) “Corporate Governance and Performance
– Expectations and Realities”, Corporate Governance
Press Coverage, http://www.mckinsey.com.
(“Institutional investors are
willing to pay a premium for well-governed companies.”).
Bauer, B.,
and Guenser, N. (April 2003) “Good Corporate Governance
pays off!”, ABP Investments, http://www.deminor.org/.
(“Portfolios of companies with
high corporate governance standards perform better than
companies with worse standards. Investors value well-governed companies significantly
higher.”)
PeopleSoft
Presentation materials (2001, 2003) “Striking a New Balance”
and “Institutional Investor Preferences: 2003 Second Quarter
Results”, Working Council for CFOs.
(“While investors penalize poor
transparency … they reward good corporate governance efforts.
[measured by “Opacity Discount” and “Corporate Governance
e Premium”]).
Brand and Reputation Value
Red Herring, (July 1, 1999) “Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz
brings a powerful brand to his new venture firm”, Red
Herring.
(“Never
before in the history of our country has there been a lower
level of trust in public institutions and corporations,"
he [Howard Schultz, CEO, Starbuck's] says. Given consumers'
disenchantment, he thinks that brands that inspire trust
are more valuable than ever.”)
Moore,
C., and de Bruin, A.(June 2004) “A Transaction Cost Approach
to Understanding Ethical Behaviour”, World Congress
of Social Economics, Albertville, France
(“In
recent years, intangible asset growth has been the major
driver of corporate market value, with some estimates suggesting
that it accounts for more than 80 per cent of market value.”)
World
Economic Forum (January 2004) 2004 Annual Meeting Survey,
“Voice for the Leaders Survey”.
(“A
majority of members believe 40% or more of their company’s
market capitalization is represented by brand/reputation.”)
("Corporate reputation
is a more important measure of success than stock market
performance, profitability and return on investment, according
to a survey of some the world’s leading CEOs and organization
leaders. Only the quality of products and services edged
out reputation as the leading measure of corporate success.")
Market Share
Anders, G. (November 2001) “Business Fights Back:
eBay Learns to Trust Again”, Fast Company.
(“Today, eBay commands more
than 80% of the online consumer and small-business auction
market.”)
Investment and Growth
Zak,
P. J., and Knack, S. (1997, September 10, 1998 version).
“Trust and Growth”, unpublished, Claremont Graduate
University.
(“The amount invested decreases
as trust diminishes in principal-agent relationships, adversely
impacting income growth. “Investment and growth improve with trust.”)
Revenue
Anders,
G. (November 2001) “Business Fights Back:
eBay Learns to Trust Again”, Fast Company.
(“[At eBay] we do $2.25 billion
worth of gross sales a quarter entirely on trust”, according
to eBay's chief financial officer, Rajiv Dutta.)
(“Some 34 million people now
participate in eBay, which consists of buyers and sellers
from all over the world. Hardly any of them know one another.
Nonetheless, they ring up commerce at a staggering
rate of nearly $10 billion a year, taking it on faith that
someone really will send the money or ship the goods on
time. In the overwhelming majority of cases, that trust
is richly repaid.”)
Yankelovich (2004) “State of
Consumer Trust: Rebuilding the bonds of trust”, Yankelovich.
(45%
of consumers have lost trust in a business.
As a result 94% spend less; 76% tell family and friends;
58% stop shopping there for some time; and 49% increase
business with competitor.)
Price
Yankelovich (2004) “State
of Consumer Trust: Rebuilding the bonds of trust”, Yankelovich.
(“Most consumers shop at businesses
that have earned their trust – even if they charge more.”)
Kalyanam,
K., and McIntyre, S. (2001) “Returns on Reputation in
Online Auction Markets”, unpublished.
(“From the perspective of the
seller, the implications are that good behaviour is rewarded
with higher prices (on average 19%) on eBay.”)
Price Volatility
Liesman, S. (July 18, 2002) “The strange Disconnect
Between The Stock Market and Economy”, Wall Street Journal.
(“Most
economists will tell you that the current disconnect between
stocks and the economy is – at least in the post-war era
– historic…. The
Market at the moment is doing its own thing for its own
reasons. And not many – or even any – of those reasons
concern the direction of the economy.
Accounting scandals and corporate corruption, the
war on terrorism – all provide sound reasons for what many
say is a rethink of the multiple that investors will pay
for future earnings. Part
of what we’re watching is the painful recalibration of risk.”)
Profitability
Hacker,
S. K., Willard, M. A., and Couturier, L. (2002) “The
Trust Imperative”, American Society of Quality, pp.
7.
(“A 1999 Watson Wyatt Worldwide
survey reported ‘companies with employees who had high trust
and confidence in senior management had a three year total
return to shareholders of 108 percent versus a 66 percent
return for companies with low trust and confidence levels.’”)
(“The Atlanta Consulting Group
… provides even more compelling evidence of the connection
between trust and profitability.” “The study … found a high
correlation between trust and profitability. In divisions that outperformed others, 84%
of survey respondents said they had high levels of trust,
as compared to lower-performing divisions in which only
27% believed trust was high. The findings provide evidence of a relationship
between the level of trust in organizations and the success
of major improvement initiatives like team, quality, customer
services, and engineering.
More importantly, it supports a strong link between
trust and overall company results.”)
Hart,
C. W., and Johnson, M. D. (1999) “Growing the trust relationship”,
Marketing Management.
(“Building customer trust grows
ever more profitable. As a result of their trust bond with HP, customers
migrate toward limiting their choices to one company: HP.
Such customers often "take themselves out of the market,"
not even considering competitive options. Why would they
do this? Evaluating other offers takes time, which is costly
and in short supply, and history has taught these customers
that HP would come out on top in a vendor analysis anyway.
Furthermore, this customer asset is uniquely capable of
talking to others, powering a referral-generation machine.
Here lies a wellspring of brand equity.”)
Simons,
T. (2002) “The High Cost of Lost Trust”, ForeThought,
Harvard Business Review.
(Tony Simons' study, "The
high cost of lost trust" (Harvard Business Review,
Sept. 2002) focused on pinpointing the real cost associated
with low-trust environments.
It demonstrated that the U.S. and Canadian Holiday
Inn hotels where managers followed through on promises and
had behavioral integrity were more profitable.
“Where employees strongly believed their managers
followed through on promises and demonstrated the values
they preached were substantially more profitable than those
whose managers scored average or lower.
So strong was the link, in fact, that a one-eighth
point improvement on the five-point scale could be expected
to increase the hotel’s profitability by 2.5% of revenues
– in this study, that translates to a profit increase of
more than $250,000 per year per hotel.
No other single aspect of manager behavior that was
measured had as large an impact on profits.”)
Effectiveness
Hacker, S. K., Willard, M.
A., and Couturier, L. (2002) “The Trust Imperative”,
American Society of Quality, pp. 2.
(“Jeffery
Pfeffer, professor of organizational behaviour at Stanford
University, discovered the indispensability of trust.
In the book, Leader to Leader, he outlines the three
basic principles leaders use to transform their organizations:
build trust, encourage change, and use appropriate
measures of performance. Warren Bennis, one of the most published authors
on leadership, concurs that the underlying issue in aligning
people with goals is establishing trust.”)
(A study by Royal Dutch Shell
pointed to four characteristics common to companies with
life spans of 200-700 years. Trust is essential to producing the latter
three (Hacker claims only the latter two) of the four:
1.
They are financially conservative (risk management);
2.
They demonstrate sensitivity to the world around them [Note:
Trust Enablement™ is predicated on the requirement that
organizations be sensitive to the levels of trust required
by their stakeholders];
3.
They create a sense of cohesion and identity; and
4.
They limit central control and exhibit tolerance for activities
in the margins.
“To
ensure effectiveness, then, leaders must instill a climate
of trust in order to innovate and transform as the environment
dictates.”)
Productivity
Hacker,
S. K., Willard, M. A., and Couturier, L. (2002) “The
Trust Imperative”, American Society of Quality, pp.
6.
(“In 1994, Federal Express
and IDS both increased their productivity by up to 40 percent
by creating empowered work teams trusted with many of the
responsibilities traditionally held by managers. Trust is the key pillar that supports empowerment
and cooperation within organizations.”)
Hart,
C. W., and Johnson, M. D. (1999) “Growing the trust relationship”,
Marketing Management.
(“The value of trust was demonstrated
in a study reported in HBR and conducted by Jeffrey Dyer
of the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and Wujin
Chu of the Seoul University School of Management…. The U.S. automaker that suppliers scored lowest
in trust spent roughly 50% of face-to-face time negotiating
price or assigning blame for problems, as opposed to the
automaker scoring highest in trust, where only 25% of the
time spent was on these relatively unproductive activities.
Similarly, the volume of purchases handled by the highest
trust automaker was double that of the manufacturer who
was least trusted. Trust relationships pay off in tangible
ways.”)
Chami,
R., and Fullenkamp, C. (October 1999 - July 2001 version)
“Trust and Efficiency”, Social Science Research Network
Electronic Paper Collection.
(“When employees who work together
trust each other, they exert more effort in their jobs and
expend less effort monitoring each other.
This leads to increased productivity, lower costs,
and greater satisfaction for workers as well as shareholders….
It is in every corporation’s interest to consider
developing a culture of trust as a way of improving performance.”)
Hacker, S. K., Willard, M.
A., and Couturier, L. (2002) “The Trust Imperative”, American
Society of Quality, pp. 4.
(“La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes,
Shleifer, and Vishny describe a significant positive correlation
between trust and performance. Simply put, trust promotes performance.”)
Ezekiel, Z. (2005) “Rebuilding
Trust in Canadian Institutions”, The Conference Board
of Canada.
(“Decreased
public trust often translates into increased scrutiny and
regulation. Some U.S. commentators have expressed concern
about the cost of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
However, the Act (along with similar initiatives
here in Canada) was a response to a perceived need to rebuild
public trust in capital markets following scandals such
as Enron and WorldCom.”)
Change
Shaw,
R. B. (1996) “Trust in the Balance”, pp. 3, Jossey-Bass
Inc.
(“Trust increases the likelihood
of successful change.”)
Hacker,
S. K., Willard, M. A., and Couturier, L. (2002) “The
Trust Imperative”, American Society of Quality, pp.
5.
(“Conclusions reached by Horst
Kern support the notion that “when employees distrust the
commitment of their organizations, they fear that innovation
might result in job changes or, worse yet, downsizing.”)
Breen,
B., and Dahle, C. (December
1999) “Trust for Change”, Fast Company.
(A Ford Motor Company study
of getting people to work together on change found that
the average time to execute a change took 89 weeks.
They calculated that 39 of those weeks were a direct
result of distrust, because of people sitting on information
or refusing to share ideas.
“Trust equals speed.
Once people have stopped worrying about what the
other guy’s agenda is, you can make changes much more quickly.”)
Ezekiel, Z. (2005) “Rebuilding
Trust in Canadian Institutions”, The Conference Board of
Canada.
(“Distrust can stall the
launch of new initiatives, policies and
products. Consumer distrust of biotechnology and biotechnology
companies, for example, has forced delays in the launch
of various products, including bioengineered sugar beets,
potatoes and wheat.”)
Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Volken, T. (2002) “Elements of Trust: The
Cultural Dimension of Internet Diffusion Revisited”,
Electronic Journal of Sociology.
(“Trust fulfills various and
important societal functions. Most importantly for our concerns
here, it facilitates innovative actions…. Trust, one can summarize, is of fundamental
importance for the diffusion of a new technological style
in the knowledge society…. At
the same time, trust substantially reduces transaction,
control, monitoring and enforcement costs and therefore
makes available more resources for productive use. Innovative
networks with a high level of trust tend to reinforce not
only the innovate capacity but also trust….
Trust as a cultural resource raises the overall innovative
capacity of a social system, since it allows economic and
also political agents to take advantage of their extended
potential for action”)
Keser,
C., Leland, J., Shchat, J., and Juang, H. (2002) “Trust,
the Internet, and the Digital Divide”, IBM Research
Report.
(“Our results suggest that
trust does, in fact, influence Internet adoption.
Since low trust countries tend to be low or middle
income countries, this will result in a digital divide between
these countries and higher-trust, higher-income ones.”)
Efficiency
Shaw,
R. B. (1996) “Trust in the Balance”, pp. 135, Jossey-Bass
Inc.
(“High trust organizations
rely on fewer controls of a more strategic and critical
nature”)
Fukuyama,
F. (1996) “Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity”,
pp. 258-268, Free Press Paperbacks.
(The Lean production system,
a system that is cheaper in terms of total capital costs
and more productive per unit of capital than mass production
“that constituted such a powerful boon to productivity that
it was soon analyzed and copied by other countries, is founded
on the principle of high-trust being shown in the lowliest
assembly line worker.)
Fukuyama, F. (1996) “Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity”, pp. 342,
Free Press Paperbacks.
(“Lean manufacturing is perhaps
the clearest example of the efficiency gains that can come
from the proliferation of network structures in the context
of a high-trust society.”)
Cost Savings
Peppers,
D., and Rogers, M. (October 2004) “Intel Measures Trust
to Grow its Business”.
(“The research showed that
Web site improvements drove trust values up, which in turn
positively affected the number of downloads and saved Intel
millions of dollars in customer-support costs.” When navigation
aids and assistance tips were added “successful downloads
increased by 6 percent, trust by 3.5 percent and satisfaction
by 4.5 percent, according to Bryan Rhoads, Intel Web Strategist.”)
Sustainability
Anders, G. (November 2001)
“Business Fights Back: eBay Learns to Trust Again”, Fast Company.
(“So strong is eBay’s hold,
say some observers, that the only force capable of stopping
eBay is eBay itself.”)
Accenture (2004) “The business
of trust”, white paper referencing the World Economic
Forum.
(“Such a decline could never be good news, but it is
particularly worrying today because new ways of doing business
depend on high trust levels. The emergence of what Accenture
has termed the ‘Connected Corporation’, with its permeable
boundaries and complex web of links to other people and
organizations, places great emphasis on the establishment
and maintenance of relationships, and of a highly collaborative
approach to business.
Without trust, customers and suppliers would be reluctant
to do business with people they had never met (a major problem
in this Internet-enabled age); employees would be nervous
about working collaboratively with people from the other
side of the world, some of whom could even be employed by
their competitors; shareholders would be nervous about investing
in businesses about which they did not have a deep personal
knowledge; and leaders would not give employees the necessary
freedom to behave in an entrepreneurial way.
Business
today also needs the trust and confidence of society to
operate successfully. Without this, governments are likely
to regulate to limit companies’ freedom of action, which
may in turn constrain the entrepreneurial spirit. In these
tough times, it is especially important for business to
have the support of government and indeed society at large.”)
Employee Attraction and Retention
Hacker, S. K., Willard, M.
A., and Couturier, L. (2002) “The Trust Imperative”,
American Society of Quality, pp. 6.
(A client of Hacker and fellow
authors purposely designed a highly engaging and empowering
work environment as a strong value proposition for attracting
talent, which resulted in the lowest turnover in the Portland
metropolitan area, even though they ranked in the middle
of the area’s salary range.)
Armour,
S. (February 5, 2002) “Employees’ new motto: Trust no
one”, USA Today, published by Council of Public Relations
Firms.
("Employees
are scrutinizing their own firms. Management experts say
workers will become less naive about their own company's
finances and missions after the harrowing Enron headlines.
More will ask questions and cast a critical eye on their
own CEOs.
’Executives are looking out
for the good of major shareholders, not employees,’ says
Kusner, 33, in Denver. ‘It's hurt trust. People who lived
through the Depression are frugal. This could have the same
kind of lasting attitude change.’
The breakdown is having ramifications.
Anxious employees are swamping financial counselors to learn
about protecting themselves from worst-case scenarios. They're
negotiating severance and outplacement help before they
take a job, taking new steps to provide their own golden
parachutes. And they're watching CEOs with a wary eye, putting
top executives on the hot seat and demanding more communication
from their companies.
The distrust is widespread.
Only 10% of adults surveyed think corporations can be trusted
a great deal to look out for the interests of their employees,
according to a USA TODAY/ CNN/Gallup poll.
For companies, this is more
than mere inconvenience. This goes to the bottom line. Employers
who fail to restore workers' faith risk costly defections:
Studies show lack of trust is a top reason employees quit.
That's troubling news to companies now dogged by
accusations of impropriety, because the breakdown of trust
is making it tough to keep and retain top talent just when
it's needed most”)
("Corporate greed has
never been seen on a scale that we're seeing now,"
says Mike Olson, CEO of Washington, D.C.-based American
Society of Association Executives, which promotes voluntary
associations. "Employees are going to ask more questions
and become more involved in learning about their companies'
finances. Companies
are going to have to deal with that or find themselves at
the end of the line."
Workers are worried about their
own fi